On Monday I arrived at work at 09:00 am and spent most of the day handling routine tasks. I had lunch at 01:05 pm and continued working until about 05:00 pm. I left the office and was home around 06:00 pm. I watched television for a while and went to bed around 10:00 pm. It was a pretty normal day and nothing out of the ordinary really happened.
On Tuesday I woke up at around 10:00 am and reached the office by 11:00 am. I worked until 02:00 pm and then had lunch at 02:05 pm. The rest of the afternoon was quiet. I took a short break and went to the local store at 03:15 pm and returned around 04:00 pm. I finished work at 05:00 pm and got home by 06:00 pm.
At 08:00 pm I met Heather at Meat&Greens for dinner. We talked for a while and everything seemed fine. I left the bar around 09:00 pm. Later that night, around 11:25 pm, Heather came to my house and started kicking the door. I never saw her again after that... alive, I mean. I honestly did not do anything to her and I don’t know what happened to that girl. Around 11:50 pm I went outside to take out the garbage, turned on the terrace light, and that’s when I noticed her there.
On Wednesday I woke up early, around 04:00 am, because I needed to pick up some items from my mother’s place. That took a few hours, and I arrived at the office at approximately 08:00 am. I worked until 04:00 pm. I felt a bit drained and just wanted to be alone, so I went home and stayed inside for the rest of the evening. I didn’t really talk to anyone.
On Thursday I arrived at work around 09:30 am and worked through most of the day. I left shortly after 05:00 pm. I can’t really remember doing anything significant that evening. I think I ate something simple and tried to relax. The day kind of just blended together.
On Friday I worked only until 01:00 pm. After that I drove around for a while just to clear my head. I don’t recall exactly where I went or how long I was out. I eventually returned home and stayed there for the rest of the evening. I didn’t feel like seeing anyone.
On Saturday I woke up late, sometime around noon. I spent most of the day indoors watching shows and scrolling on my phone. In the evening I believe I ordered food and stayed in. I don’t remember much else about that day.
On Sunday I woke up early and cleaned the house. I tried to organize some things and get ready for the coming week. I didn’t have any visitors and kept to myself. I mostly just stayed home and rested.
B. Analysis Results (Visual)
🔍 VeriDecs Analysis
Primary Label: time_gap_indicator
Analysis: VeriDecs detected stylistic markers consistent with this category.
⚖️ Culpability Assessment
The statement giver is likely the culprit or, at minimum, has direct knowledge of the crime.
Suspected Time Frame: Tuesday night between 11:25 PM and 11:50 PM, at or immediately outside the statement giver’s residence.
⚠️ Deception Signals Detected (Leakage)
Severity: leakage_detected
Signals:
Narrative Tense Shift
Vague Denial
Self-Correction or Reframing
Unnecessary Words
Pronoun Omission
Truth Qualifiers
Tense Shift Phrases
Pronoun or Perspective Shift
Possessive Attribution Drift
Prompt-Answer Tense Mismatch
10 narrative leakage pattern(s) detected. Each flagged feature may reflect emotional detachment, memory reconstruction, or intent reframing. Interpret carefully and triangulate with context.
📚 What Is Leakage?
In the context of statement analysis and Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN), leakage refers to the unintentional release of information by a person who is trying to be deceptive. It is the core concept behind these techniques.
The fundamental premise is that when a person is lying, they cannot completely conceal the truth. Instead, the truth "leaks" out through subtle, often subconscious, linguistic cues. An honest statement is a report of an event as it happened, while a deceptive statement is a fabrication. The process of creating and maintaining a lie is cognitively demanding, and this cognitive load can manifest in specific patterns of language that can be detected through careful analysis.
✂️ Why Sentence Length Matters
One of the foundational principles in SCAN is: “The shortest sentence is the best sentence.” — Mark McClish.
Truthful people tend to speak in short, direct sentences. Their words reflect what they experienced, not what they’re trying to construct. In contrast, deceptive individuals often use longer, more complex sentences filled with qualifiers, justifications, and emotional padding.
These longer structures may indicate cognitive strain or an effort to manage perception. When leakage is present, it often appears alongside verbose or overly detailed statements — a sign that the speaker is working hard to maintain a fabricated narrative.
🌀 Narrative Tense Shift Detected VeriDecs flagged a shift in grammatical tense, moving from past to present. This kind of transition often signals a change in how the speaker is mentally framing the event — it may reflect emotional intensity, reconstructed memory, or a deliberate reframing of reality. When someone recounts a story from memory, they typically use the past tense. But when the narrative slips into the present, it can suggest the speaker is no longer recalling but instead reimagining or performing the event. In deception contexts, this shift may indicate the story isn’t anchored in lived experience, but is being constructed in real time.
Detected Phrases:
I never saw her again after that... alive, I mean.
🌀 Narrative Shift Detected VeriDecs detected a change in grammatical tense across the statement. This may reflect altered perception, memory reconstruction, or emotional refocusing.
📌 Tense mismatch detected across clauses.
⚠️ Vague Denial Detected
VeriDecs flagged emotionally softened denial phrasing. These statements avoid directly denying the act, and often reflect moral distancing or hypothetical rejection rather than factual clarity.
I never
never.
🧠 Why This Matters:
Vague denials can sound convincing, but they often sidestep the core accusation. Instead of saying what did or didn’t happen, the speaker may describe what they “would never do” or what they “believe” or "I could never" or "I am not capable.." etc. — which leaves room for ambiguity and plausible deniability.
🔍 Key Insight:
A vague denial sounds like a denial — but it isn’t. Saying “I would never ask someone to lie” is not the same as saying “I did not ask someone to lie.” The former expresses a general moral stance; the latter addresses the specific accusation.
📌 Examples:
When President Clinton said, “I would never ask anybody to do anything other than tell the truth,” it sounded like a denial — but it wasn’t. He didn’t say he hadn’t done it; he said it’s something he wouldn’t do. That subtle shift leaves open the possibility that he did it anyway.
Lance Armstrong, 2005: "If you consider my situation: a guy who comes back from arguably, you know, a death sentence [Armstrong's 1996 cancer diagnosis and treatment], why would I then enter into a sport and dope myself up and risk my life again? That's crazy. I would never do that. No. No way." Later he finally admitted to all his cheating in sports.
🧩 Word “never” Detected
The word “never” is often mistaken for a direct denial, but it’s not the same as saying “no.” In fact, “never” is a temporal negative, not a factual one. It refers to time — not truth.
In interviews or investigations, a person may say “I would never do that” or “I never did that,” which can sound convincing. But these phrases often avoid answering the actual question, especially when a simple “yes” or “no” is required. This subtle shift allows the speaker to morally distance themselves from the accusation without directly denying it.
🧠 Truth Qualifier Detected This statement contains language that may signal narrative discomfort, distancing, or hesitation. These phrases often soften commitment or introduce uncertainty. Such phrases often reflect what the speaker wishes to express — rather than what they are committed to stating as truth. They may soften, qualify, or emotionally buffer the message, which can obscure factual clarity.
i believe
🔢 Number Three Detected
This statement contains references to the number three — either as a digit, word, or time format (e.g., 3:00 or 03:30). While seemingly benign, the number three has drawn attention in deception research due to its frequent appearance in fabricated narratives.
In 2009, Mark McClish conducted two studies exploring deceptive language. In the first, 48% of participants who fabricated a story between 1:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. introduced their first time reference as 3:00 or 3:30. In the second, when asked to invent a break-in scenario and report the number of stolen guns, three was the most cited number — chosen by 15 participants, compared to 11 who chose five.
While not definitive proof of deception, the recurrence of “three” in fabricated accounts may reflect subconscious patterning or cognitive bias. VeriDecs flags this as a linguistic anomaly worth further consideration.
03:15
🧠 Pronoun Omission Detected
SCAN methodology flags all pronoun omissions as areas of analytical interest.
In many cases this is normal grammatical structure. However, when such omissions occur near sensitive narrative zones, they may sometimes reflect psychological distancing or narrative compression. Context determines significance.
Detected Sentences With/ Or Transition To - Pronoun Omission:
▸ spent (1 time) Context:On Monday I arrived at work at 09:00 am and **spent** most of the day handling routine tasks. I had lunch at 01:05 pm and continued working until about 0
▸ continued (1 time) Context:rived at work at 09:00 am and spent most of the day handling routine tasks. I had lunch at 01:05 pm and **continued** working until about 05:00 pm. I left the office and was home around 06:00 pm. I watched television
▸ went (2 times) Context:il about 05:00 pm. I left the office and was home around 06:00 pm. I watched television for a while and **went** to bed around 10:00 pm. It was a pretty normal day and nothing out of the ordinary really happened.
▸ reached (1 time) Context:normal day and nothing out of the ordinary really happened. On Tuesday I woke up at around 10:00 am and **reached** the office by 11:00 am. I worked until 02:00 pm and then had lunch at 02:05 pm. The rest of the aft
▸ returned (1 time) Context:. The rest of the afternoon was quiet. I took a short break and went to the local store at 03:15 pm and **returned** around 04:00 pm. I finished work at 05:00 pm and got home by 06:00 pm. At 08:00 pm I met Heather at
▸ got (1 time) Context:k and went to the local store at 03:15 pm and returned around 04:00 pm. I finished work at 05:00 pm and **got** home by 06:00 pm. At 08:00 pm I met Heather at Meat&Greens for dinner. We talked for a while and ev
▸ started (1 time) Context:d fine. I left the bar around 09:00 pm. Later that night, around 11:25 pm, Heather came to my house and **started** kicking the door. I never saw her again after that... alive, I mean. I honestly did not do anything
▸ turned (1 time) Context:to her and I don’t know what happened to that girl. Around 11:50 pm I went outside to take out the garbage, **turned** on the terrace light, and that’s when I noticed her there. On Wednesday I woke up early, around 04:
▸ stayed (4 times) Context:08:00 am. I worked until 04:00 pm. I felt a bit drained and just wanted to be alone, so I went home and **stayed** inside for the rest of the evening. I didn’t really talk to anyone. On Thursday I arrived at work a
▸ worked (1 time) Context:rest of the evening. I didn’t really talk to anyone. On Thursday I arrived at work around 09:30 am and **worked** through most of the day. I left shortly after 05:00 pm. I can’t really remember doing anything sign
▸ tried (1 time) Context:pm. I can’t really remember doing anything significant that evening. I think I ate something simple and **tried** to relax. The day kind of just blended together. On Friday I worked only until 01:00 pm. After that
▸ blended (1 time) Context:ything significant that evening. I think I ate something simple and tried to relax. The day kind of just **blended** together. On Friday I worked only until 01:00 pm. After that I drove around for a while just to cle
▸ scrolling (1 time) Context:e. On Saturday I woke up late, sometime around noon. I spent most of the day indoors watching shows and **scrolling** on my phone. In the evening I believe I ordered food and stayed in. I don’t remember much else abou
▸ cleaned (1 time) Context:I ordered food and stayed in. I don’t remember much else about that day. On Sunday I woke up early and **cleaned** the house. I tried to organize some things and get ready for the coming week. I didn’t have any vis
▸ get (1 time) Context:se about that day. On Sunday I woke up early and cleaned the house. I tried to organize some things and **get** ready for the coming week. I didn’t have any visitors and kept to myself. I mostly just stayed home
▸ kept (1 time) Context:ouse. I tried to organize some things and get ready for the coming week. I didn’t have any visitors and **kept** to myself. I mostly just stayed home and rested.
▸ rested (1 time) Context:ready for the coming week. I didn’t have any visitors and kept to myself. I mostly just stayed home and **rested**.
Omission of Subject Pronoun (1st or 3rd Person): When a speaker omits expected subject pronouns before verbs—especially during emotionally charged or critical moments—it may signal **psychological distancing, lack of ownership, or a rehearsed narrative**. This pattern is especially revealing when paired with tense shifts or fragmented storytelling.
1. **First-Person ('I'/'We'):** Suggests the speaker is unwilling to take **psychological ownership** of their own actions.
2. **Third-Person ('He'/'She'/etc.):** Often occurs when describing someone else's actions, particularly at a **critical moment** of tension or violence. The omission suggests the speaker is mentally or psychologically **distancing themselves** from the action or is reciting a *rehearsed or fabricated* event rather than recalling a full, sensory memory. This is especially significant when the omission coincides with a **tense shift** (e.g., past tense to present tense) or a shift to the Historical Present.
🧭 Narrative Ownership Analysis
VeriDecs compared the use of personal pronouns (e.g., “I,” “me”) with passive voice and universal language (e.g., “was seen,” “you can imagine”). This reveals how much the speaker linguistically owns their experience versus distancing from it.
Personal Pronouns: 48
Passive/Universal Language: 0
Why It Matters:
Truthful speakers typically use direct, personal language to describe their experiences. When passive constructions or generalized phrasing dominate, it may reflect emotional distancing, discomfort, or reluctance to claim ownership of the narrative.
Phrases like “was too difficult” or “you generally have the impression” shift focus away from the speaker and dilute personal commitment. This is especially significant in high-stakes or emotionally charged contexts.
Summary: The speaker uses personal pronouns more frequently than passive or universal language. This suggests a strong personal presence and a greater degree of linguistic commitment to the narrative.
🔍 Unnecessary Words Detected
This statement contains words that may not affect sentence clarity but can reflect emotional distancing, discomfort, or verbal control. While some may be stylistic, others may signal deeper psychological patterns such as minimization, persuasion, or embedded self-correction. Check the flagged words used: if used often it may be subject's way of speaking, if only used once check the context. The word 'so' often used may signal the person is explaining his actions.
Detected Terms:
▸ just (4 times) Minimizing The word 'just' is used to minimize the significance of an action or event. It can be an attempt to downplay responsibility or to make a critical action seem unimportant.
▸ really (3 times) Persuasion & Emphasis These words are used as an effort to convince the listener. An honest person doesn't feel the need to emphasize their truthfulness; they simply state the facts. These are often used when the speaker knows the facts are not convincing on their own.
▸ honestly (1 time) Persuasion & Emphasis These words are used as an effort to convince the listener. An honest person doesn't feel the need to emphasize their truthfulness; they simply state the facts. These are often used when the speaker knows the facts are not convincing on their own.
▸ only (1 time) Persuasion & Emphasis These words are used as an effort to convince the listener. An honest person doesn't feel the need to emphasize their truthfulness; they simply state the facts. These are often used when the speaker knows the facts are not convincing on their own.
▸ i think (1 time) Qualifiers & Lack of Commitment These phrases indicate a lack of commitment or certainty to the statement. The speaker is creating a way out in case their statement is later proven false. This is a classic sign of deception where the speaker avoids firm responsibility for the information.
▸ kind of (1 time) Softening & Minimizing These words are used to minimize or soften the impact of an event. They can be used to downplay a critical action or reduce the speaker's emotional connection to the event they are describing.
⚠️ Unsolicited Justification Detected (Word "Because")
The word **'because'** signals an explanation or justification offered without being directly asked 'why'. This indicates the subject is **anticipating scrutiny** and feels compelled to defend or explain their actions/statement. The information immediately preceding or following this trigger is often highly **sensitive** and should be examined for potential deception or omission.
Detected Triggers:
▸ because (1 time) Unsolicited Explanation (Anticipatory) The word 'because' is a strong signal for an **Unsolicited Explanation**. Its presence suggests the subject is **anticipating** being asked 'why' and feels compelled to provide a justification immediately. This compulsion often makes the information immediately preceding or following the 'because' highly **sensitive** or a **lie**. (Note: The unsolicited nature is inferred, as the preceding question may not be present for 100% confirmation.)
🧠 Memory Uncertainty & Evasion Detected
This statement contains phrases that express memory failure, uncertainty, or an unwillingness to commit to a specific detail. These are often used to create an alibi for missing information or to avoid telling a lie that could be later disproven.
Detected Phrases:
▸ approximately (1 time)
▸ i believe (1 time)
Why It Matters:
A high frequency of phrases like "I don't remember" or "I'm not sure" for **key events** suggests the speaker is intentionally vague. Truthful people generally say what they remember; deceptive people may use these phrases to avoid creating verifiable falsehoods or to lessen their **commitment** to an answer. While normal for minor details, heavy reliance on non-commitment language can signal **evasion** or a constructed narrative.
Statement Analysis Context:
📝 Non-Commitment:
Phrases like "I guess," "maybe," or "I believe" are used to avoid confirming the truth of a statement, creating a mental **out** for the speaker.
📝 Alibi for Missing Info:
Claiming "bad memory" for crucial moments is a verbal strategy to explain the **absence of detail** that a person involved in the incident should be able to recall vividly.
🕰️ Temporal Phrasing Detected
This statement contains time-related language that may reflect narrative compression, omission, or strategic vagueness. These phrases often appear when speakers skip over events, delay realizations, or avoid committing to specific timelines.
Detected Phrases:
▸ then (1 time) Sequence & Compression 'Then' can be used to compress time or hide skipped actions. When used ambiguously or repeatedly, it often signals an attempt to avoid scrutiny by glossing over details between events.
▸ after (1 time) Spanning Time & Omission General use of 'after' implies a gap between events. If no details are provided for the time that elapsed, it may indicate intentional omission or missing information.
▸ about (2 times) Temporal Uncertainty Words like 'maybe,' 'about,' 'i think,' or 'i guess' introduce uncertainty. This can reflect memory manipulation or an intentional vagueness to avoid committing to a precise timeline.
▸ i think (1 time) Temporal Uncertainty Words like 'maybe,' 'about,' 'i think,' or 'i guess' introduce uncertainty. This can reflect memory manipulation or an intentional vagueness to avoid committing to a precise timeline.
▸ after that (2 times) Temporal Lacunae (Missing Gap) These phrases span time and indicate a missing gap (Lacunae). They are used to gloss over a period that contains information the subject either considers unimportant or, more significantly, is deliberately **withholding sensitive information** about.
💡 Investigative Tip
Use flagged temporal phrases to identify narrative blind spots or inconsistencies. Look for compressed sequences, vague time windows, or uncertain timestamps that may obscure key events. Cross-reference these with known timelines, surveillance data, or witness accounts to uncover omissions or strategic reframing.
🧠 Weak Assertion Detected
The statement contains linguistic cues that may indicate a lack of commitment or distancing from the narrative.
Specific Findings:
Phrases Found:
▸I think I ate something simple and tried to relax.
▸In the evening I believe I ordered food and stayed in.
🔁 Self-Correction Detected VeriDecs identified linguistic revision or narrative pivoting during the denial. This may reflect hesitation, emotional discomfort, or real-time reframing.
Pause + rephrase (with reframe cue)
📅 Daily Activity TimelineVisual Rhythm Map
This interactive breakdown highlights how each day unfolded, revealing rhythm, peaks, and continuity across time blocks.
🗓️ Monday
Unnarrated Activity
⏱ 12:00 AM – 9:00 AM
I arrived at work at and spent most of the day handling routine tasks. I had lunch at
⏱ 9:00 AM – 1:05 PM
continued working until about
⏱ 1:05 PM – 5:00 PM
I left the office and was home around
⏱ 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM
I watched television for a while and went to bed around
⏱ 6:00 PM – 10:00 PM
It was a pretty normal day and nothing out of the ordinary really happened
⏱ 10:00 PM –
🗓️ Tuesday
Unnarrated Activity
⏱ 12:00 AM – 10:00 AM
I woke up at around and reached the office by
⏱ 10:00 AM – 11:00 AM
I worked until
⏱ 11:00 AM – 2:00 PM
then had lunch at
⏱ 2:00 PM – 2:05 PM
The rest of the afternoon was quiet. I took a short break and went to the local store at
⏱ 2:05 PM – 3:15 PM
returned around
⏱ 3:15 PM – 4:00 PM
I finished work at
⏱ 4:00 PM – 5:00 PM
got home by
⏱ 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM
At
⏱ 6:00 PM – 8:00 PM
I met Heather at Meat&Greens for dinner. We talked for a while and everything seemed fine. I left the bar around
⏱ 8:00 PM – 9:00 PM
Later that night, around
⏱ 9:00 PM – 11:25 PM
Heather came to my house and started kicking the door. I never saw her again after that... alive, I mean. I honestly did not do anything to her and I don’t know what happened to that girl. Around
⏱ 11:25 PM – 11:50 PM
I went outside to take out the garbage, turned on the terrace light, and that’s when I noticed her there
⏱ 11:50 PM –
🗓️ Wednesday
Unnarrated Activity
⏱ 12:00 AM – 4:00 AM
I woke up early, around , because I needed to pick up some items from my mother’s place. That took a few hours, and I arrived at the office at approximately
⏱ 4:00 AM – 8:00 AM
I worked until
⏱ 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM
I felt a bit drained and just wanted to be alone, so I went home and stayed inside for the rest of the evening. I didn’t really talk to anyone
⏱ 4:00 PM –
🗓️ Thursday
Unnarrated Activity
⏱ 12:00 AM – 9:30 AM
I arrived at work around and worked through most of the day. I left shortly after
⏱ 9:30 AM – 5:00 PM
I can’t really remember doing anything significant that evening. I think I ate something simple and tried to relax. The day kind of just blended together
⏱ 5:00 PM –
🗓️ Friday
Unnarrated Activity
⏱ 12:00 AM – 1:00 PM
After that I drove around for a while just to clear my head. I don’t recall exactly where I went or how long I was out. I eventually returned home and stayed there for the rest of the evening. I didn’t feel like seeing anyone
⏱ 1:00 PM –
🗓️ Saturday
Unnarrated Activity
⏱ 12:00 AM –
🗓️ Sunday
Unnarrated Activity
⏱ 12:00 AM –
📊 Activity Metrics Overview
Visual performance summary for each day.
Friday
Blocks: 1 (11 below peak)
Total Active: 0h 0m
Avg Interval: 0 min
Monday
Blocks: 5 (7 below peak)
Total Active: 13h 0m
Avg Interval: 156 min
Saturday
Blocks: 0 (12 below peak)
Total Active: 0h 0m
Avg Interval: 0 min
Sunday
Blocks: 0 (12 below peak)
Total Active: 0h 0m
Avg Interval: 0 min
Thursday
Blocks: 2 (10 below peak)
Total Active: 7h 30m
Avg Interval: 225 min
Tuesday
Blocks: 12 (🔥 Peak)
Total Active: 13h 50m
Avg Interval: 69.17 min
Wednesday
Blocks: 3 (9 below peak)
Total Active: 12h 0m
Avg Interval: 240 min
📈 Peak Day: Tuesday
📊 Avg Daily Blocks: 3.29
🧠 Behavioral Insights
Friday
Friday showed lower activity —
Monday
Monday showed lower activity —
Saturday
Saturday showed lower activity —
Sunday
Sunday showed lower activity —
Thursday
Thursday showed lower activity —
Tuesday
Tuesday had peak activity —
Wednesday
Wednesday showed lower activity —
📌 Reflection Suggestions
🔸 Peak days may indicate intense focus, emotional spikes, or overload. Reflect on sustainability.
🔹 Low-activity days may reveal missed structure or narrative disruption. Consider context.
🔎 Deviations expose pacing irregularities — useful for spotting stress or transitions in rhythm.
🎭 Voice Shift Detected
VeriDecs detected a shift between personal and group pronouns. This may reflect narrative inconsistency, authorship leakage, or strategic responsibility framing.
Pronoun Transitions:
🔄 we ➝ i
🔄 i ➝ we
📌 Tense Mismatch in Denial
VeriDecs detected a present-tense denial that may not directly address a past-tense question. This can reflect narrative evasion or scope deflection.
Trigger Phrase:
🕰️ never
⚠️ Denial Tense Divergence
Denial Tense Divergence Detected:
Text contains both present and past tense verbs.
This suggests your answer may not align with the timing of the accusation.
Consider whether you reframed the scope or shifted the event window.
🔍 Example:
Joey Buttafuoco said in 1992: “I don’t cheat on my wife.”
This denial is in the present tense and may have been technically true at that moment.
But it did not address past behavior. A year later, he admitted to having had an affair in 1991.
Because he didn’t say “I didn’t cheat” or “I’ve never cheated,” his denial avoided lying while still misleading.
📌 Why It Matters:
Verb tense reveals the temporal scope of a denial. Present-tense statements like “I don’t…” can be used
to dodge accountability for past actions. In deception analysis, tense divergence helps identify
loopholes, evasions, or truthful misdirection. It’s a subtle but powerful linguistic cue.
🔎 Activity Confession Scan
This analysis detects signs of deception by examining chronological narratives for inconsistencies, time gaps, and behavioral leakage.
⚖️ Culpability Assessment:
The statement giver is likely the culprit or, at minimum, has direct knowledge of the crime.
⏱️ Suspected Time Frame:
Tuesday night between 11:25 PM and 11:50 PM, at or immediately outside the statement giver’s residence.
🧠 Analysis Breakdown:
Embedded Confession
The phrase 'I never saw her again after that... alive, I mean' acknowledges seeing Heather dead. This self-correction reveals knowledge of her death before any discovery is described and functions as an embedded admission.
Omission of Expected Actions
After 'that’s when I noticed her there' at 11:50 pm, there is no mention of calling emergency services, checking for signs of life, or seeking help. The omission of expected, prosocial actions after discovering a person 'there' is highly suspicious.
Suspicious Time Window
Heather arrives 'around 11:25 pm' and the body is 'noticed' at 'around 11:50 pm.' The 25‑minute gap, coupled with the change in activity ('went outside to take out the garbage' and 'turned on the terrace light'), pinpoints a narrow, critical window for the incident.
Premature Denial and Distancing
The unsolicited denial 'I honestly did not do anything to her and I don’t know what happened to that girl' includes the qualifier 'honestly' and the distancing term 'that girl,' both of which increase suspicion and signal psychological distance from the victim.
Behavioral Leakage
Hedging and minimizing appear repeatedly: 'everything seemed fine,' 'I think,' 'I believe,' 'I don’t recall exactly,' 'I can’t really remember.' These suggest uncertainty and avoidance around sensitive periods.
Disproportionate Detail vs. Critical Event Minimization
Noncritical periods receive precise timestamps ('01:05 pm lunch,' '03:15 pm store'), while the alleged discovery is vague ('noticed her there') with no sensory or procedural details. This imbalance indicates potential concealment around the critical event.
Reality Shift/Inconsistency
The location shifts from 'Meat&Greens for dinner' (a restaurant) to 'left the bar around 09:00 pm.' This change in labeling can signal narrative instability around the evening with Heather.
Linguistic Contradiction and Self-Repair
Stating 'I never saw her again after that' conflicts with 'that’s when I noticed her there.' The immediate self-repair 'alive, I mean' reveals concealed knowledge while attempting to reconcile the contradiction.
Unusual Late-Night Activity
Taking out the garbage at 'around 11:50 pm' is atypical and contextually coincides with the discovery. Coupled with 'turned on the terrace light,' it suggests purposeful activity outside aligned with the incident window.
Post-Event Alibi/Disposal Indicators
On Wednesday: 'woke up early, around 04:00 am... pick up some items from my mother’s place. That took a few hours.' The unusual early trip, vague purpose, and duration ('a few hours') immediately after the night in question suggest potential alibi construction or evidence movement.
Emotional Leakage and Isolation
Following Tuesday, the subject reports 'felt a bit drained,' 'just wanted to be alone,' 'I didn’t feel like seeing anyone,' indicating stress consistent with post-incident affect rather than normal routine.
Memory Erosion After the Incident
From Thursday to Saturday: 'I can’t really remember,' 'I think I ate something,' 'I don’t recall exactly where I went,' 'I believe I ordered food.' The abrupt increase in uncertainty after Tuesday signals stress around the timeframe.
Psychological Distance Toward Victim
Shifting from the name 'Heather' to 'that girl' reduces personal connection and often correlates with guilt or an attempt to depersonalize the victim.
Time Gap Before Heather’s Arrival and Minimal Account
After 'left the bar around 09:00 pm' there is no narrative until 'around 11:25 pm' when Heather arrives at the door. The two-hour gap is unaccounted for, despite earlier precise timing, suggesting sensitive activity not disclosed.
🧠 Possessive Reframing Detected
VeriDecs observed a shift from personal ownership ("my") to neutral reference ("the") for the same object. This may reflect emotional distancing, disownership, or narrative staging.
Transitions:
🔄 house: my ➝ the
⏱️ Suspected Day / Time Leakage
Clauses indicating potential temporal distortion or priority manipulation.
On Monday I arrived at work at 09:00 am
spent most of the day handling routine tasks . I had lunch at 01:05 pm
continued working until about 05:00 pm . I left the office
was home around 06:00 pm . I watched television for a while
went to bed around 10:00 pm . It was a pretty normal day
🚨nothing out of the ordinary really happened . On Tuesday I woke up at around 10:00 am
reached the office by 11:00 am . I worked until 02:00 pm
had lunch at 02:05 pm . The rest of the afternoon was quiet . I took a short break
went to the local store at 03:15 pm
returned around 04:00 pm . I finished work at 05:00 pm
got home by 06:00 pm . At 08:00 pm I met Heather at Meat&Greens for dinner . We talked for a while
everything seemed fine . I left the bar around 09:00 pm . Later that night
🚨around 11:25 pm
Heather came to my house
started kicking the door . Ineversawheragainafter that ... alive
I mean . Ihonestly did not do anything to her
🚨I do n’t know what happened to that girl . Around 11:50 pm I went outside to take out the garbage
turned on the terrace light
that ’s when I noticed her there . On Wednesday I woke up early
📝around 04:00 am
because I needed to pick up some items from my mother ’s place . That took a few hours
I arrived at the office at approximately 08:00 am . I worked until 04:00 pm . I felt a bit drained
just wanted to be alone
I went home
stayed inside for the rest of the evening . I did n’t really talk to anyone . On Thursday I arrived at work around 09:30 am
worked through most of the day . I left shortly after 05:00 pm . I ca n’t really remember doing anything significant that evening . I thinkI ate something simple
tried to relax . The day kind ofjust blended together . On Friday I worked only until 01:00 pm . After that I drove around for a while just to clear my head . I do n’t recall exactly where I went or how long I was out . I eventually returned home
stayed there for the rest of the evening . I did n’t feel like seeing anyone . On Saturday I woke up late
sometime around noon . I spent most of the day indoors watching shows
scrolling on my phone . In the evening I believeI ordered food
stayed in . I do n’t remember much else about that day . On Sunday I woke up early
cleaned the house . I tried to organize some things
get ready for the coming week . I did n’t have any visitors
kept to myself . I mostly just stayed home
📝rested .
✨ Leakage Highlighted Across The Full Statement
Chronological sentence breakdown with visually marked leakage patterns.
On Monday I arrived at work at 09:00 am and spent most of the day handling routine tasks.
I had lunch at 01:05 pm and continued working until about 05:00 pm.
I left the office and was home around 06:00 pm.
I watched television for a while and went to bed around 10:00 pm.
It was a pretty normal day and nothing out of the ordinary really happened.
On Tuesday I woke up at around 10:00 am and reached the office by 11:00 am.
I worked until 02:00 pm and then had lunch at 02:05 pm.
The rest of the afternoon was quiet.
I took a short break and went to the local store at 03:15 pm and returned around 04:00 pm.
I finished work at 05:00 pm and got home by 06:00 pm.
At 08:00 pm I met Heather at Meat&Greens for dinner.
We talked for a while and everything seemed fine.
I left the bar around 09:00 pm.
Later that night, around 11:25 pm, Heather came to my house and started kicking the door.
I never saw her again after that.
.
.
alive, I mean.
I honestly did not do anything to her and I don’t know what happened to that girl.
Around 11:50 pm I went outside to take out the garbage, turned on the terrace light, and that’s when I noticed her there.
On Wednesday I woke up early, around 04:00 am, because I needed to pick up some items from my mother’s place.
That took a few hours, and I arrived at the office at approximately 08:00 am.
I worked until 04:00 pm.
I felt a bit drained and just wanted to be alone, so I went home and stayed inside for the rest of the evening.
I didn’t really talk to anyone.
On Thursday I arrived at work around 09:30 am and worked through most of the day.
I left shortly after 05:00 pm.
I can’t really remember doing anything significant that evening.
I think I ate something simple and tried to relax.
The day kind ofjustblended together.
On Friday I workedonly until 01:00 pm.
After that I drove around for a while just to clear my head.
I don’t recall exactly where I went or how long I was out.
I eventually returned home and stayed there for the rest of the evening.
I didn’t feel like seeing anyone.
On Saturday I woke up late, sometime around noon.
I spent most of the day indoors watching shows and scrolling on my phone.
In the evening I believe I ordered food and stayed in.
I don’t remember much else about that day.
On Sunday I woke up early and cleaned the house.
I tried to organize some things and get ready for the coming week.